Supreme Court Declines To Broaden Whistleblower Protections
Supreme Court Declines To Broaden Whistleblower Protections
Published on February 23, 2018 at 06:00PM
The U.S. Supreme Court this week refused to broaden protections for corporate insiders who call out misconduct, ruling they must take claims of wrongdoing to the Securities and Exchange Commission in order to be shielded against retaliation. From a report: The justices ruled 9-0 in favor of Digital Realty Trust, throwing out a lawsuit brought against the California-based real estate trust by a fired former employee who had reported alleged wrongdoing only internally and not to the SEC. The 2010 Wall Street reform law known as the Dodd-Frank Act is unambiguous in offering no protection from retaliation such as firing or demotion to employees who report claims of securities law violations only in-house, the court ruled.
Hope you like this please comment your view and share to your friends thanks for visiting bye guys meet you in next post
Published on February 23, 2018 at 06:00PM
The U.S. Supreme Court this week refused to broaden protections for corporate insiders who call out misconduct, ruling they must take claims of wrongdoing to the Securities and Exchange Commission in order to be shielded against retaliation. From a report: The justices ruled 9-0 in favor of Digital Realty Trust, throwing out a lawsuit brought against the California-based real estate trust by a fired former employee who had reported alleged wrongdoing only internally and not to the SEC. The 2010 Wall Street reform law known as the Dodd-Frank Act is unambiguous in offering no protection from retaliation such as firing or demotion to employees who report claims of securities law violations only in-house, the court ruled.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Hope you like this please comment your view and share to your friends thanks for visiting bye guys meet you in next post
Supreme Court Declines To Broaden Whistleblower Protections
Reviewed by Kartik
on
February 23, 2018
Rating:
No comments: