Supreme Court: Warrant Generally Needed To Track Cell Phone Location Data
Supreme Court: Warrant Generally Needed To Track Cell Phone Location Data
Published on June 22, 2018 at 03:14PM
daveschroeder writes: The Supreme Court on Friday said the government generally needs a warrant if it wants to track an individual's location through cell phone records over an extended period of time. The ruling [PDF] is a major victory for advocates of increased privacy rights who argued more protections were needed when it comes to the government obtaining information from a third party such as a cell phone company. The 5-4 opinion was written by Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the four most liberal justices. It is a loss for the Justice Department, which had argued that an individual has diminished privacy rights when it comes to information that has been voluntarily shared with someone else.
Hope you like this please comment your view and share to your friends thanks for visiting bye guys meet you in next post
Published on June 22, 2018 at 03:14PM
daveschroeder writes: The Supreme Court on Friday said the government generally needs a warrant if it wants to track an individual's location through cell phone records over an extended period of time. The ruling [PDF] is a major victory for advocates of increased privacy rights who argued more protections were needed when it comes to the government obtaining information from a third party such as a cell phone company. The 5-4 opinion was written by Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the four most liberal justices. It is a loss for the Justice Department, which had argued that an individual has diminished privacy rights when it comes to information that has been voluntarily shared with someone else.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Hope you like this please comment your view and share to your friends thanks for visiting bye guys meet you in next post
Supreme Court: Warrant Generally Needed To Track Cell Phone Location Data
Reviewed by Kartik
on
June 22, 2018
Rating:
No comments: